Methodology

Every figure on this site is traceable to a record somebody else published. Nothing is estimated to fill a gap, and where the public record does not answer a question, the tool says so instead of producing a number.

That constraint is the whole design. It decides which tools exist, what they will answer, and what they refuse.

1. Where the data comes from

Every figure traces to an institution that stands behind it. Nothing is modelled where it can be observed, and nothing is asserted where the record is silent. The inputs fall into five groups.

  • The carbon crediting registries. Project records, issuances, retirements and status changes come from the registries that hold them, including Verra, Gold Standard, the American Carbon Registry, the Climate Action Reserve and the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions. A university research group also maintains a consolidated record across registries, and it is used where a cross registry view is needed.
  • Governments and their agencies. Emissions trading programmes publish their own allowance prices. The European Commission publishes its trading system and border adjustment rules. The United Kingdom government publishes the greenhouse gas conversion factors used for emissions reporting, and the United States environmental agency publishes spend based factors for supply chain estimates.
  • Scientific and space agencies. NASA publishes satellite fire detections, which is how a forestry project's exposure to fire is checked against observation rather than assumption. The United States geological survey publishes earthquake records. Global forest monitoring programmes publish tree cover loss.
  • International institutions. The United Nations publishes sustainable development indicators and the records of the climate convention. The World Bank publishes governance indicators, country economic series and natural hazard assessments. The science based targets initiative publishes sector decarbonisation pathways.
  • Published statistics and the press. National grid carbon intensity comes from published energy statistics. Market coverage comes from carbon market publications and newswires.

Every dataset is collected on a schedule and read from our own copy, so a tool answers from a record that was already checked rather than from whatever a distant server happens to return while you wait. Each figure carries the date of the record it came from, because these sources move on very different clocks and presenting a quarterly figure as today's price would be its own kind of dishonesty.

2. What is deliberately not used

Some of the most commonly quoted carbon numbers cannot be sourced without paying for them, and a free product that quotes them anyway is guessing.

  • Voluntary transaction prices. What a voluntary credit actually traded at sits behind commercial price reporting services. No tool here states one. Where a voluntary credit's value is the question, the tools show what determines it instead: the methodology, the permanence class, the unretired overhang and the quality position.
  • Per project impact claims. Jobs created, households benefited, hectares protected and litres of water improved are not published per project in any free dataset. They are named as unavailable rather than estimated.
  • Anything on chain. Tokenised carbon pools and decentralised liquidity are not read, not priced and not counted.
  • Broker and over the counter reports. Not obtainable, so not used, and no composite is built that pretends to include them.

3. How a project is scored

The quality index is a weighted score across twelve dimensions. It is arithmetic on records, run the same way every time, so the same project scores the same today as it did last month unless the underlying record changed.

Methodology integrity18
Permanence class14
Reversal record12
Verification currency•
Buffer pool contribution•
Host country governance•
Compliance acceptance•
Crediting period standing•
Developer track record•
Declared co-benefits•
Delivery against issuance•
Public scrutiny•

Methodology integrity carries the most weight because it is the question that decides whether a tonne was ever real. An independent integrity council assesses crediting methodologies against a set of core principles, and what it concluded about the methodology behind a project is used directly rather than interpreted.

The weighting is not fixed. A compliance buyer, who must surrender a credit to a regulator, can shift the weight onto compliance acceptance and verification currency. A removals buyer can shift it onto permanence and reversals. The weighting in force is shown alongside every score, and changing it changes the score visibly rather than silently.

A dimension with no evidence behind it is excluded from the score and reported as unscored, rather than being given a neutral middle value. Averaging in a guess would move the result while looking like information, and a project with thin public evidence should read as thin rather than as average.

4. How prices are handled

There is no composite price and no blended index. Each compliance market's price is the price that market published, converted to a common currency where a comparison needs one, and shown with the date it was set.

Before any figure is computed from a price series, single day bad prints are removed. Some published series carry an isolated value at roughly half the surrounding level for exactly one day before returning, and a price that halves and doubles back overnight is a recording error rather than a market move. The number of prints removed is stated next to the market it was removed from.

Where a forward range is shown, it is each market's own realised trend carried forward, with a band set by that market's own realised volatility. It is a projection of what has already happened, described as an assumption rather than a forecast, and a market whose published prices are too sparse or too erratic to support one is listed with the reason instead of being given a line anyway.

5. When something is missing or wrong

A source going down is normal, and it must never turn into a wrong answer. Two rules cover it.

  • Nothing fails silently. When a figure cannot be produced, the tool names which figure and why, and every other figure on the page continues to work. A blank space where a number should be is treated as a defect.
  • Reports check themselves. A report that states a total also recomputes it from its own parts before it is shown. If the two disagree, nothing is shown at all. A figure that fails its own check is worse than no figure, because it looks like an answer.

Data is refreshed on a schedule rather than on demand, so a busy source cannot make a page slow and a failed refresh leaves the previous good copy in place with its own date attached.

6. Data credits

These are the organisations whose published data reaches this site, what each one supplies, and the terms it is published under. Where a licence asks for credit, this is where it is given. Sources in the public domain are listed as a matter of record.

  • Berkeley Carbon Trading Project, Voluntary Registry Offsets Database
    Cross registry project records, issuance by vintage, retirements, buffer and reversal figures, and the removal and reduction classes on the company pages.
    Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  • CarbonPlan, OffsetsDB
    The consolidated registry snapshot behind project counts, totals and project pages, and the credit records behind issuance and retirement by vintage, the organisations named as buyers and the company retirement pages.
    Published under CC BY 4.0. CarbonPlan claims no copyright in the underlying registry facts.
  • Verra, Gold Standard, American Carbon Registry, Climate Action Reserve, ART TREES, Cercarbono and Isometric
    Project, issuance and retirement records published by each registry.
    Public registry records, credited to the registry that holds them.
  • Gold Standard
    Project records and the Sustainable Development Goals each project declares.
    Published project data, credited.
  • Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM)
    Core Carbon Principles assessment decisions on programmes and methodologies.
    Published assessments, credited.
  • International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP), Allowance Price Explorer
    Allowance price histories for compliance carbon markets.
    Published by ICAP, credited.
  • European Energy Exchange (EEX), the EU ETS common auction platform
    EU ETS primary auction results: clearing price, volume and bids.
    Public auction reports, which the platform is required to publish.
  • European Commission
    CBAM certificate prices, CBAM default values, EU ETS and CBAM legislation, and the verified emissions, free allocation and compliance status of each installation, from the Union Registry.
    Reuse permitted with acknowledgement of the source (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU).
  • The World Bank
    Governance indicators, development indicators and climate projections.
    Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  • ThinkHazard!, World Bank Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery
    Natural hazard levels by location, and by country in the Credit Passport and the country pages.
    Hazard levels CC BY; recommendation text CC BY-SA.
  • Global Forest Watch, World Resources Institute
    Tree cover loss at project locations.
    Attribution required under its terms of service.
  • OpenStreetMap contributors
    Turning place names into locations.
    Open Database License (ODbL). Map data (c) OpenStreetMap contributors.
  • NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS)
    Satellite fire detections.
    Public domain. We acknowledge the use of data from NASA FIRMS, part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System.
  • United States Geological Survey
    The earthquake catalogue.
    Public domain.
  • United Kingdom Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    Greenhouse gas conversion factors for company reporting.
    Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
    Supply chain greenhouse gas emission factors.
    Public domain, as a work of the United States government.
  • United Nations Statistics Division
    Sustainable Development Goal indicators by country.
    Published by the United Nations, credited.
  • Our World in Data
    Electricity grid carbon intensity by country.
    Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  • Science Based Targets initiative
    Company climate targets and commitments.
    Published target data, credited.
  • Carbonmark
    Listed prices for voluntary carbon credits on its marketplace, in the Benchmark Tracker and the price forecast.
    Prices Carbonmark publishes for its own marketplace listings, credited.
  • Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, FRED
    Energy spot prices from the US Energy Information Administration and exchange rates from the Federal Reserve, for the market board and the price forecast.
    The underlying series are US government works in the public domain. Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
  • Article 6 Pipeline, UNEP Copenhagen Climate Centre (UNEP CCC)
    Each country's Article 6 activity: bilateral agreements, its authority for the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism, and the activities it has approved, in the Credit Passport and the country pages.
    Cited in the form the platform asks for: Article 6 Pipeline, UNEP Copenhagen Climate Centre (UNEP CCC), accessed monthly.
  • International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
    The CORSIA emissions unit programme approvals and eligibility dates behind the CORSIA screen.
    Published decisions of the ICAO Council, credited.
  • Central Electricity Authority, Government of India
    India's grid emission factor, from its CO2 baseline database.
    Government of India publication, credited.

Each organisation publishes its data independently and none of them endorses CRBN.credit or the figures computed from their records.

See it applied

Every tool described above has a recorded walkthrough, run against real data with the output it produced.

Watch the walkthroughs

Methodology is reviewed periodically and weightings may be updated as market structure and public data availability change. Published figures reflect the methodology in effect at the time of calculation, and each figure carries the date of the record behind it.